Archive for June, 2010

June 26th 2010
The Most Cost Effective Way To Save The Chesapeake Bay

Posted under Chesapeake Bay

If you are concerned about the Chesapeake Bay and how to restore it to health, don’t miss former Senator Gerald Winegrad’s article in today’s Capital. An excerpt:

Agriculture contributes 43 percent of the nitrogen, 45 percent of the phosphorus and 60 percent of the sediment to the bay, more than any other source of these three key pollutants;

For some river systems, farm pollutants overwhelm pollution from development and all other sources;

Agriculture has met only 50 percent of its pollution reduction goals that were supposed to be met by 2010. For wastewater treatment plants, 99 percent of the phosphorus and 78 percent of the nitrogen goals have been met despite huge increases in sewerage flows and great expense, including the Flush Tax on all Marylanders; and

Reducing farm pollutants is the most cost-effective way to save the bay.

Winegrad asks, “We wouldn’t let a town of 25,000 people dump untreated human waste on open lands; why should we allow the dumping of the equivalent amount of manure from 150,000 chickens without meaningful regulation?”

Winegrad is part of a group environmental leaders that’s recommending 8 science-based measures to curb pollution into the Bay from agriculture. You can read that entire report here.

Comments Off

June 15th 2010
Column: New Ideas To Make The State Budget Leaner

Posted under Budget

Yesterday, the Capital published an Op-Ed I wrote about how Maryland can make its budget leaner and more efficient. Here’s an excerpt:

I have spent the past several months knocking on doors in Broadneck, Annapolis and south county, talking to Marylanders about their concerns. One topic keeps coming up: The state budget.

There’s a good reason: Maryland faces at least a $6 billion structural deficit over the next four years. We should not try to solve this problem through tax increases and furloughs. We need to take the problem head on by making government leaner and more efficient.

To do so, we need to open ourselves up to new solutions. Here are some ideas worth considering:

1. Switch most state employees to a four-day, 40-hour work week. By doing this, the state could close most offices on Friday. Police, firefighters, prisons, courts and other essential services would continue to operate on a regular schedule. Utah implemented this schedule last year and saved millions by reducing energy use 13 percent and cutting maintenance bills. Employees saved over $6 million on gasoline and had more flexibility to spend time with their families. Citizens benefit because state agencies are open later, giving them more flexibility. Maryland, with more than twice the population of Utah, could enjoy even greater savings.

2. End special interest giveaways. Maryland plans to spend over $40 million between now and 2020 subsidizing the purchase of coal. This is not only a waste of money, it runs counter to our goal of increasing the use of green, renewable resources. The state fails to even calculate the cost of dozens of other special interest tax breaks. All of these measures should be scrutinized and eliminated, where appropriate.

3. Embrace open source software. The state should stop paying millions of dollars to companies such as Microsoft for bloated software full of features most state employees do not use. Open source software is available for free or at a nominal cost. For example, while Microsoft Office costs hundreds of dollars, OpenOffice is a free alternative with virtually identical functionality. A recent study found the federal government could save nearly $4 billion a year by switching to open source software. Maryland could certainly reap substantial savings. Moreover, IT experts say open source software is now more secure than its traditional counterparts.

4. Eliminate or consolidate state boards and agencies. There are some state agencies we can eliminate completely. For example, we have an agency called the State Board of Contract Appeals, dedicated to adjudicating disputes between the state and its contractors. In 2003, a bipartisan commission recommended the agency be eliminated because the few dozen cases before it each year could be handled more efficiently by the regular court system. Seven years later, it is still around and taxpayers are on the hook for $3 million over the next five years to keep it running.

In other cases, we can consolidate functions. We currently have one group of engineers, architects and planners devoted to building stadiums and arenas (Maryland Stadium Authority) and another devoted to building schools (Interagency for Public School Construction). These two entities perform many of the same tasks and could be combined into a unified state construction agency.

You can read the whole thing here.

Please let me know your thoughts. You can reach me directly at judd@juddlegum.com or 443-510-8880.

Comments Off

June 10th 2010
Kickoff!

Posted under News & Politics

Last weekend, we had a very successful kickoff for the campaign. Thanks to everyone who braved the heat, especially those who hit the streets afterward to knock doors.

If you’d like to get involved with the campaign, you can sign up to volunteer here.

Comments Off

June 3rd 2010
The Two Faces of Anne Arundel County

Posted under New Line

As I walk door-to-door in my district, the economic diversity of the area is striking. One minute you find yourself surrounded by multi-million dollar mansions. You turn the corner and you find extremely modest homes.

The Community Foundation of Anne Arundel County recently released a fascinating report documenting the deep pockets of poverty in a largely affluent and bucolic community. Although 39% of families earn in excess of $100,000 a year, many others struggle. The report’s findings include:

Poverty. Over 22,000 Anne Arundel County residents lived in poverty as of the middle of this decade according to recent U.S. Census data, and over 7,000 of these are children.

Health. In addition to difficulties accessing housing, the share of Anne Arundel residents lacking health insurance swelled to 57,000 people in 2007, or more than 11 percent of the population.

Public Transportation. Limited public transportation imposes significant barriers on access to both work and public services for many Anne Arundel citizens. Only 3 percent of Anne Arundel residents utilize public transit to get to work.

A bright spot was in education. The report found that graduation rates have increased substantially over the last several years and the gap between White and minority graduation rates has narrowed considerably.

You can read Pamela Wood’s article on the report here.

You can check out the entire report for yourself here.

Comments Off