<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steele Praises House GOP Partisanship: Stimulus Bill &#8216;Goose Egg Was Just Beautiful&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.juddlegum.com/blog/2009/01/steele-praises-house-gop-partisanship-stimulus-bill-goose-egg-was-just-beautiful/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.juddlegum.com/blog/2009/01/steele-praises-house-gop-partisanship-stimulus-bill-goose-egg-was-just-beautiful/</link>
	<description>News and commentary about Maryland policy and politics. Written by Judd Legum -- attorney, Annapolis native and candidate for Delegate in District 30.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:36:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BT</title>
		<link>http://www.juddlegum.com/blog/2009/01/steele-praises-house-gop-partisanship-stimulus-bill-goose-egg-was-just-beautiful/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>BT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 15:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juddlegum.com/blog/?p=384#comment-54</guid>
		<description>If you think about it, the bi-partisan vote on the Stimulus package was &quot;NO&quot;. 

Both Republicans (All of them) and Democrats (10 of them) voted NO.
Only Democrats voted yes.

It seems that the partisans were in the majority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think about it, the bi-partisan vote on the Stimulus package was &#8220;NO&#8221;. </p>
<p>Both Republicans (All of them) and Democrats (10 of them) voted NO.<br />
Only Democrats voted yes.</p>
<p>It seems that the partisans were in the majority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Street &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Whats A Wingnut To Do</title>
		<link>http://www.juddlegum.com/blog/2009/01/steele-praises-house-gop-partisanship-stimulus-bill-goose-egg-was-just-beautiful/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>American Street &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Whats A Wingnut To Do</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 03:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juddlegum.com/blog/?p=384#comment-53</guid>
		<description>[...] Sarah and Rush vie for the hearts and minds of the Republican Party. New RNC Chair, Steele, already praised the House GOP for uniting against fixing the economy. I see a junior varsity version of Hillary vs. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sarah and Rush vie for the hearts and minds of the Republican Party. New RNC Chair, Steele, already praised the House GOP for uniting against fixing the economy. I see a junior varsity version of Hillary vs. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Lofton, Recovering Republican</title>
		<link>http://www.juddlegum.com/blog/2009/01/steele-praises-house-gop-partisanship-stimulus-bill-goose-egg-was-just-beautiful/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>John Lofton, Recovering Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 02:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juddlegum.com/blog/?p=384#comment-52</guid>
		<description>FYI, might want to listen to my exclusive interview with Michael Steele and comment. Thanks. JL.

http://www.theamericanview.com/index.php?id=1205
 
And forget, please, &quot;conservatism,&quot; please. It will not “save” us because it has been, operationally, de facto, Godless and therefore irrelevant. Secular conservatism will not defeat secular liberalism because to God both are two atheistic peas-in-a-pod and thus predestined to failure. As Stonewall Jackson&#039;s Chief of Staff R.L. Dabney said of such a humanistic belief more than 100 years ago:

&quot;[Secular conservatism] is a party which never conserves anything. Its history has been that it demurs to each aggression of the progressive party, and aims to save its credit by a respectable amount of growling, but always acquiesces at last in the innovation. What was the resisted novelty of yesterday is today .one of the accepted principles of conservatism; it is now conservative only in affecting to resist the next innovation, which will tomorrow be forced upon its timidity and will be succeeded by some third revolution; to be denounced and then adopted in its turn. American conservatism is merely the shadow that follows Radicalism as it moves forward towards perdition. It remains behind it, but never retards it, and always advances near its leader. This pretended salt bath utterly lost its savor: wherewith shall it be salted? Its impotency is not hard, indeed, to explain. It is worthless because it is the conservatism of expediency only, and not of sturdy principle. It intends to risk nothing serious for the sake of the truth.&quot;

Our country is collapsing because we have turned our back on God (Psalm 9:17) and refused to kiss His Son (Psalm 2).

John Lofton, Editor, TheAmericanView.com
Recovering Republican
JLof@aol.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI, might want to listen to my exclusive interview with Michael Steele and comment. Thanks. JL.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theamericanview.com/index.php?id=1205" rel="nofollow">http://www.theamericanview.com/index.php?id=1205</a></p>
<p>And forget, please, &#8220;conservatism,&#8221; please. It will not “save” us because it has been, operationally, de facto, Godless and therefore irrelevant. Secular conservatism will not defeat secular liberalism because to God both are two atheistic peas-in-a-pod and thus predestined to failure. As Stonewall Jackson&#8217;s Chief of Staff R.L. Dabney said of such a humanistic belief more than 100 years ago:</p>
<p>&#8220;[Secular conservatism] is a party which never conserves anything. Its history has been that it demurs to each aggression of the progressive party, and aims to save its credit by a respectable amount of growling, but always acquiesces at last in the innovation. What was the resisted novelty of yesterday is today .one of the accepted principles of conservatism; it is now conservative only in affecting to resist the next innovation, which will tomorrow be forced upon its timidity and will be succeeded by some third revolution; to be denounced and then adopted in its turn. American conservatism is merely the shadow that follows Radicalism as it moves forward towards perdition. It remains behind it, but never retards it, and always advances near its leader. This pretended salt bath utterly lost its savor: wherewith shall it be salted? Its impotency is not hard, indeed, to explain. It is worthless because it is the conservatism of expediency only, and not of sturdy principle. It intends to risk nothing serious for the sake of the truth.&#8221;</p>
<p>Our country is collapsing because we have turned our back on God (Psalm 9:17) and refused to kiss His Son (Psalm 2).</p>
<p>John Lofton, Editor, TheAmericanView.com<br />
Recovering Republican<br />
<a href="mailto:JLof@aol.com">JLof@aol.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
